NO CLE - Where Federal Statutes Collide: What § 363 Does Not Clear Out
Three cases in the last year have demonstrated that § 363 does not fix everything. In Dean Foods, § 363 did not protect the purchaser from the Sherman Antitrust Act; the purchaser was forced to divest itself of purchased assets in a U.S. DOJ antitrust action. In GNC, CFIUS interposed (unsuccessfully) to try to prevent the sale of assets to a Chinese company owned by the PRC government. Finally, in Exide, CERCLA rendered four contaminated properties unsalable, resulting in abandonment (arguably in contravention of the SCOTUS Midlantic decision, appeal pending). This panel will discuss these issues and more.
Free Session
Users are required to log in before viewing this recording. ABI Members please log in on the right with your username and password. Your audio or video will be available immediately.
If you are NEW to the site, please create an account now to access the audio or video.
If you are having trouble with log in or creating an account contact us at support@abi.org.